<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photocop Woes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.farmdevil.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=76" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.farmdevil.net/?p=76</link>
	<description>when I&#039;m in charge...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:29:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: farmd</title>
		<link>http://www.farmdevil.net/?p=76&#038;cpage=1#comment-2084</link>
		<dc:creator>farmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 04:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farmdevil.net/?p=76#comment-2084</guid>
		<description>I was just reading the IEEE-CS/ACM Software Engineering code of ethics and I found this:

&quot;Affix their signature only to documents prepared under their supervision or within their areas of competence and with which they are in agreement.&quot;

I think this is a key problem that I have with the photocop system. Bill Harper clearly wasn&#039;t guided by a code of ethics such as this when his signature was affixed to my ticket. I am currently working on preparing a personal code of ethics for a course. I think reading the codes of ethics that are out there and thinking critically about what they mean is really important to me. I do try to live my life by certain principles that don&#039;t seem to be matched by any of the individuals named above. Though some were helpful in their own ways, none of them really sees an ethical obligation to take care of this situation and make it right. I may write more about this once I am done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just reading the IEEE-CS/ACM Software Engineering code of ethics and I found this:</p>
<p>&#8220;Affix their signature only to documents prepared under their supervision or within their areas of competence and with which they are in agreement.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think this is a key problem that I have with the photocop system. Bill Harper clearly wasn&#8217;t guided by a code of ethics such as this when his signature was affixed to my ticket. I am currently working on preparing a personal code of ethics for a course. I think reading the codes of ethics that are out there and thinking critically about what they mean is really important to me. I do try to live my life by certain principles that don&#8217;t seem to be matched by any of the individuals named above. Though some were helpful in their own ways, none of them really sees an ethical obligation to take care of this situation and make it right. I may write more about this once I am done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
